Size / / /

At Nine Worlds GeekFest, I sat on a panel called RaceFail 101 where in the space of 75 minutes we tried to unpack the question of whether we have progressed in light of issues that came to light after the many RaceFail discussions that we have had online.

Talking about race and representation is always a slippery thing, and I found myself wondering what it is that we hope to achieve when we have yet another discussion on this subject. I think that if we are truly interested in progressing as a genre, it's essential for us as readers, writers, and fans to understand the genre's history. We need to read or at least be aware of to some extent not only the classics and the things that were published in the past, but also to read commentaries and criticisms.

I know it may sound unreasonable to demand this of readers and writers who are newly come into genre, but if we want to be involved in a conversation about inequities, we need to be willing to take on this burden of becoming versed so we have some insight into what we're talking about.

Certainly, personal insight and experience and our own takeaways from the books we've read are important, but if we only think about ourselves, we fail to consider the overall impact that genre has had and continues to have on readers who engage with it.

As my fellow panelist and Mothership ToC-mate Tade Thompson said regarding the excuse of SF being an escapist genre: There is no such thing as an escapist genre, because the moment you think something is escapist, you let your guard down and that is the moment when your self becomes most vulnerable. That is also the point where escapism becomes dangerous.

Looking at things in light of these words, I find myself trembling when I think of the many misrepresentations of culture and race and gender in the field. I find myself wondering how much of our perceptions are shaped by the escapist literature we've read. How much of our attitudes have been influenced by this most dangerous of literatures.

I think then of the insightful among us who see the inequities and who understand why it's important to bring more women of color, more queer writers, and more writers talking from the perspectives of the colonized into the conversation.

I know that we have incredibly talented and clueful writers who are not of color, but I think we need to understand that in this genre, the field continues to be dominated by white cisgendered males, and often when we speak about inclusivity and diversity, the interpretation has been skewed to mean the inclusion of white cisgendered women, with a handful of writers of color or a handful of writers writing from a queer perspective.

Here then is where the heart of the matter lies. When we wish to engage in conversation, we want to be able to converse from a place of equal footing. Compare it to a chorus. If you have ten sopranos and one alto, and if they are all singing at the same volume, one needs to strain one's ears in order to hear the alto strain. In terms of reading, instead of exerting the effort to find the text that alto singer is singing, it's much easier to just listen to the text the sopranos are singing and say: Oh that's what the whole thing was about.

I've opted for the chorus illustration in the hopes that it will help us understand just how uneven the field still is and how we still need to draw in and encourage more voices coming from the margins.  It's at this point where we want the sopranos to sing a little softer so we can bring out the beautiful resonance of that alto singer—or better yet, it's at this point where we want to recruit more altos into the choir so we have more of a harmonious and pleasing sound.

But, we say, the field is improving. We are seeing more people of color being published. Certainly, we have funded and supported projects like the upcoming and much awaited Long Hidden anthology. We have funded and supported We See a Different Frontier which offers us perspectives from the colonized, and we have writers of color appearing and being invited to submit work for consideration.

These are all positive moves and these are things that prove to us that genre is working towards becoming more inclusive and progressive. But, it's still not enough.

As in the conversation that took place on the RaceFail Panel, I still find myself worrying. Writers Tricia Sullivan and Kari Sperring have pointed out to me that there is still a lack of people of color being published in the UK, and there is still a question being raised on how many writers of color the UK publishing scene has produced and brought to the forefront.

It still continues to be an uphill struggle, and while I appreciate the conversations we continue to carry on around this subject, I find myself thinking that we can only speak of progress when the playing field becomes more even and when we have more than a handful of writers representing us in the genre.

These issues of race, gender, and sexuality in genre intersect and walk hand in hand with each other, and I feel that there is perhaps something there that will help us to break through the false ceiling. I certainly hope that ten years from now, we will be having more equal conversations and instead of a RaceFail panel, we'll have one where white writers and writers of color exchange thoughts and ideas on how to write SF that's humorous, funny, and incisive, and where no one is the butt of the joke.

Rochita Loenen-Ruiz is a Filipina writer living in the Netherlands. She attended the Clarion West Writers Workshop in 2009 and was a recipient of the Octavia Butler Scholarship. Her work has been published in various online and print publications in the Philippines as well as outside of the Philippines. You can visit her website at or follow her on Twitter.
No comments yet. Be the first!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Current Issue
9 Dec 2019

“Full ahead, Mister Sal,” says Moore. I grit my teeth and force the Anastasis forward. The engines, the strongest of any ship I’ve ever steered, screech and whine like dying things. The nightgaunts are ten deep around us and it’s like flying through tar.
By: SL Harris
Podcast read by: Anaea Lay
In this episode of the Strange Horizons podcast, editor Anaea Lay presents SL Harris's “Into the Eye.”
I stand in a cell for suffrage.
By: Jessy Randall
Podcast read by: Ciro Faienza
In this episode of the Strange Horizons podcast, editor Ciro Faienza presents Jessy Randall's “Mary Agnes Chase (1869-1963).”
Wednesday: Sharp and Sugar Tooth edited by Octavia Cade 
Friday: David Mogo, Godhunter by Suyi Davies Okungbowa 
Issue 2 Dec 2019
By: Sheldon Costa
Podcast read by: Anaea Lay
By: Mari Ness
Podcast read by: Ciro Faienza
Issue 25 Nov 2019
By: Nisa Malli
Podcast read by: Ciro Faienza
Podcast read by: Nisa Malli
Issue 18 Nov 2019
By: Marika Bailey
Podcast read by: Anaea Lay
By: Alicia Cole
Podcast read by: Ciro Faienza
Issue 11 Nov 2019
By: Rivqa Rafael
Podcast read by: Anaea Lay
By: Mary McMyne
By: Ugonna-Ora Owoh
Podcast read by: Mary McMyne
Podcast read by: Ciro Faienza
Issue 28 Oct 2019
By: Kelly Stewart
Podcast read by: Ciro Faienza
Podcast read by: Kelly Stewart
Monday: Aniara 
Issue 21 Oct 2019
By: Omar William Sow
Podcast read by: Anaea Lay
By: Amy H. Robinson
Podcast read by: Ciro Faienza
Issue 14 Oct 2019
By: Kevin Wabaunsee
Podcast read by: Anaea Lay
By: Ruben Reyes Jr.
Podcast read by: Ruben Reyes Jr.
Podcast read by: Ciro Faienza
Issue 7 Oct 2019
By: Charles Payseur
Podcast read by: Anaea Lay
By: Davian Aw
Podcast read by: Ciro Faienza
Issue 30 Sep 2019
By: Kali de los Santos
Podcast read by: Anaea Lay
By: Heitor Zen
Podcast read by: Julia Quandt
By: Sérgio Motta
Podcast read by: Sérgio Motta
By: Isa Prospero
Podcast read by: Solaine Chioro
Monday: 3% 
Issue 23 Sep 2019
By: August Huerta
Podcast read by: Ciro Faienza
Load More
%d bloggers like this: