Size / / /

My name is Abigail Nussbaum, and I've been Strange Horizons's reviews editor for the last two months. Before that I'd been a blogger (at Asking the Wrong Questions) and a reviewer (for Strange Horizons and other sources) for more than five years, but it was only once I started editing other people's work that I found myself in need of some sort of statement of what kind of review I was looking for, and what constituted a good or bad review. It's easy, when you're writing your own stuff, to get by on gut instinct—something feels right or it doesn't, and if you've got a good editor (like Niall) they can often help you articulate what you're trying to accomplish, what isn't working, and how to fix it. In addition, discussions on this topic tend to strike me as unnecessarily prescriptive, full of rules that, in my experience, can just as often be profitably broken as followed—if you know what you're doing, of course. (A good exception are Niall's twin posts on different ways to start and end a review.)

But since I've started editing other people's writing, I've found myself struggling for words, for the tools with which to explain what I want for the review department, and how specific reviews are failing to bring their point across, or sometimes just muddling it. I've felt a keen awareness of the need for some sort of guidelines—for myself, as much as for the reviewers I edit. I know that I don't want to lay down immovable fiats—a Strange Horizons review must be so many words long, must avoid "I" and "me" statements, must not include spoilers—but I do need a more developed, better articulated sense of what a review for Strange Horizons should be.

So with that, I'd like to open the question up to the floor. This is the first in what I hope will become an irregular series in which I'll discuss the different questions that occur while I edit, and which I think deserve to be addressed in the reviewer's guidelines document that I'm trying to formulate. I hope you'll join in and offer your own opinions and insights. So far, what I have of the document is its opening sentences, the review department's mission statement, if you will:

A review should be informative for people who have never read, or heard about, the work in question, illuminating for those who have, and entertaining for both. Whether or not it convinces (or dissuades) its readers from seeking out the subject of the review, they should come away from it feeling that the time it took to read the review was well spent.

Over to you.

(Some interesting reading for people pondering the subject of the purpose of reviews and the form they should take: The New York Times's Why Criticism Matters project, including responses from several reviewers. Though the underlying question has less to do with criticism in general and more with the changing face of criticism in the internet age, there are some interesting responses. I particularly appreciated Sam Anderson's essay, and Elif Batuman's, for discussing the importance of negative reviews.)



Niall Harrison is an independent critic based in Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. He is a former editor of Strange Horizons, and his writing has also appeared in The New York Review of Science FictionFoundation: The International Review of Science Fiction, The Los Angeles Review of Books and others. He has been a judge for the Arthur C. Clarke Award, and a Guest of Honor at the 2023 British National Science Fiction Convention. His collection All These Worlds: Reviews and Essays is available from Briardene Books.
Current Issue
18 Nov 2024

Your distress signals are understood
Somehow we’re now Harold Lloyd/Jackie Chan, letting go of the minute hand
It was always a beautiful day on April 22, 1952.
By: Susannah Rand
Podcast read by: Claire McNerney
In this episode of the Strange Horizons Fiction podcast, Michael Ireland presents Little Lila by Susannah Rand, read by Claire McNerney. Subscribe to the Strange Horizons podcast: Spotify
Friday: The 23rd Hero by Rebecca Anne Nguyen 
Issue 11 Nov 2024
Issue 4 Nov 2024
Issue 28 Oct 2024
Issue 21 Oct 2024
By: KT Bryski
Podcast read by: Devin Martin
Issue 14 Oct 2024
Issue 7 Oct 2024
By: Christopher Blake
Podcast read by: Emmie Christie
Issue 30 Sep 2024
Issue 23 Sep 2024
By: LeeAnn Perry
Art by: nino
Issue 16 Sep 2024
Issue 9 Sep 2024
Load More