Size / / /

This is always a fun time of year. As each issue comes out, we get some idea of what our readers are enjoying most, but even more than usual, 2012 was a busy year behind the scenes here, as we welcomed new fiction editors, poetry editors, and for the first time—thanks to last autumn's incredibly successful fund drive—a podcast editor. (Those of you who haven't yet subscribed to the podcast can find it in iTunes here, by the way.) So the Readers' Poll is a nice opportunity to look back at the whole of the last year in context.

In several categories, there is a clear continuity with last year. You can check out the full results for 2010 here and 2011 here, but the short version is: congratulations to Liz Bourke, Rose Lemberg and Genevieve Valentine for topping their respective categories for a second year running. (Indeed, Rose took the number one and number two spots in poetry this year.) We're always delighted to be able to publish their work. In the fiction category, meanwhile, congratulations to Rachel Acks, whose "Come the Huntsman" proved most popular. And in articles, our round-table on "Writing Climate Change" from last February was the winner—thanks again to Julie Bertagna, Tobias Buckell, Maggie Gee, Glenda Larke, Kim Stanley Robinson, Vandana Singh, and Joan Slonczewski for their time and contributions, which made the whole conversation so fascinating.

A quick recap of the rules. We asked you to vote for your favorite works from the fiction, poetry, and articles departments, and your favorite columnists and reviewers. The poll was open from 13.00 PST on 4th March 2013 until 23.59 PST on 11th March 2013. Each person could vote for up to five works or nominees, ranking them 1 (first place) to 5 (fifth place). Each first-place vote was worth five points, each second-place vote was worth four points, and so on. It was not compulsory to vote in every category, nor to use all five slots in a given category. Multiple votes on one ballot for the same item were discarded, and we required a unique email address for the ballot to be submitted. Those addresses were only used to verify the validity of ballots.

Finally, thank you to everybody who voted—and more of you did so than in either of the last two years, which is very gratifying. We'll do it all again this time next year.

The Results

Best Story

Best Poem

Best Article

Best Columnist

  • First place: Genevieve Valentine ("Intertitles")
  • Second place: John Clute ("Scores")
  • Third place (tie): Rochita Loenen-Ruiz ("Movements")
  • Third place (tie): Eleanor Arnason ("Me and Science Fiction")
  • Fifth place: Vandana Singh ("Diffractions")

Best Reviewer

  • First place: Liz Bourke
  • Second place: Lila Garrott-Wejksnora
  • Third place: Benjamin Gabriel
  • Fourth place: Sofia Samatar
  • Fifth place: Niall Alexander



Niall Harrison is an independent critic based in Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. He is a former editor of Strange Horizons, and his writing has also appeared in The New York Review of Science FictionFoundation: The International Review of Science Fiction, The Los Angeles Review of Books and others. He has been a judge for the Arthur C. Clarke Award, and a Guest of Honor at the 2023 British National Science Fiction Convention. His collection All These Worlds: Reviews and Essays is available from Briardene Books.
Current Issue
24 Mar 2025

The winner is the one with the most living wasps
Every insect was a chalk outline of agony / defined, evaluated, ranked / by how much it hurt
In this episode of the Strange Horizons Fiction podcast, Michael Ireland presents Reprise by Samantha Lane Murphy, read by Emmie Christie. Subscribe to the Strange Horizons podcast: Spotify
Black speculative poetry works this way too. It’s text that is flexible and immediate. It’s a safe space to explore Afrocentric text rooted in story, song, dance, rhythm that natural flows from my intrinsic self. It’s text that has a lot of hurt, as in pain, and a lot of healing—an acceptance of self, black is beauty, despite what the slave trade, colonialism, racism, social injustice might tell us.
It’s not that I never read realistic fiction and not that I don’t like it. It’s just that sometimes I don’t get it. I know realistic fiction, speculative fiction, and genre fiction are just terms we made up to sell more narrative, but I’m skeptical of how the expectations and norms of realism lurk, largely uninterrogated or even fully articulated, in the way readers, editors, and publishers interact with work that purports to depict quote unquote real life.  Most broadly defined, realistic stories depict the quotidian and accurately reproduce the daily events, characters, and settings of the world we live
Issue 17 Mar 2025
Issue 10 Mar 2025
By: Holli Mintzer
Podcast read by: Emmie Christie
Issue 3 Mar 2025
Issue 24 Feb 2025
Issue 17 Feb 2025
Issue 10 Feb 2025
By: Alexandra Munck
Podcast read by: Claire McNerney
Issue 27 Jan 2025
By: River
Issue 20 Jan 2025
Strange Horizons
By: Michelle Kulwicki
Podcast read by: Emmie Christie
Issue 13 Jan 2025
Issue 6 Jan 2025
By: Samantha Murray
Podcast read by: Jenna Hanchey
Load More