Size / / /

Before we get down to business, a quick question: why run a readers' poll?

This isn't the first time we've run one, but it's the first one for a few years, so it's a question we've thought about. My answer is that it's just part of what I expect a magazine like Strange Horizons to do. When I was a teenager, the annual polls in Interzone and, later, Asimov's, were something I looked forward to—I didn't always vote, but I wanted to see what won. Partly I think it was about wanting some sort of benchmark for my developing taste; partly it was the sense it gave of a connection to a community of readers, out there somewhere in the world; and partly it was the way it helped to give the magazines I was reading an identity and a history. Today, I can look at the lists of winners in those polls and see stories I remember fondly, and winners that have entered my personal canon. And—of course—some stories I think are terrible, and remain astonished anyone could have liked.

So all of that feeds into why I wanted to reinstate the Strange Horizons poll. There are a couple of changes to the last time we did this, back in 2005. (Which, as it happens, was the year I joined the magazine; some of the winners, such as the symposium on speculative poetry, I remember being things that helped convince me Strange Horizons was something I wanted to be part of.) We didn't run a columns poll this year, because the department was under strength; but we're rectifying that with the addition of Vandana Singh to our roster last week, and Genevieve Valentine today, and with more to come, so that category should be back next year. And we polled for Best Reviewer, rather than Best Review, partly because 150 different reviews would have made for an unwieldy drop-down menu, but mostly because what's valuable about a reviews department—for me—is the continuity of voices, the personality and perspective that evolves from a body of work.

The poll was open from 13.00 GMT on 21st February 2011 until 23.59 GMT on 6th March 2011. Here's how we scored it. Each person could vote for up to five works or nominees, ranking them 1 (first place) to 5 (fifth place). Each first-place vote was worth five points, each second-place vote was worth four points, and so on. It was not compulsory to vote in every category, nor to use all five slots in a given category. Multiple votes on one ballot for the same item were discarded, and we required a unique email address for the ballot to be submitted. Those addresses were only used to verify the validity of ballots, and were only saved for the duration of the poll.

In total, over 500 votes were cast; most ballots in each category used four or five nomination slots. And so, without further ado . . .

The Results

Best Story

Best Poem

Best Article

Best Reviewer

  • First place: Abigail Nussbaum
  • Second place: Adam Roberts
  • Third place: Niall Harrison
  • Fourth place: Matthew Cheney
  • Fifth place: Farah Mendlesohn

Congratulations to all the winners, who will receive a framed certificate marking their victory. And thanks to everybody who voted. Same time next year?




Niall Harrison is an independent critic based in Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. He is a former editor of Strange Horizons, and his writing has also appeared in The New York Review of Science FictionFoundation: The International Review of Science Fiction, The Los Angeles Review of Books and others. He has been a judge for the Arthur C. Clarke Award, and a Guest of Honor at the 2023 British National Science Fiction Convention. His collection All These Worlds: Reviews and Essays is available from Briardene Books.
Current Issue
27 Nov 2023

you no longer have image. in photos your cheek² sharpens, vectors.
That cis-tem is now only a speck.
Mushrooms didn’t exactly sweep sci-fi, fantasy, and horror, but much like their real-world inspiration they persisted, growing in the damp, dark crevices of the creative minds of every generation. They were a template for the anxieties of each age, seasoned with the fears of the era.
Stories of extensive evil, in which the threat is not a single villain, nor even a man-made pollution monster, but systemic structures of harm in which we are all complicit, offer tools to think through real-life problems, which are rarely fixed by defeating one villain.
My most hearty and luxurious greetings fam, hope all are doing well. Friends, I feel like I often start this column by saying I can’t remember what happened in the previous episode. Today, I honestly cannot remember a single thing that happened last time. Fam, so many things happened lately and my brain has been all over the place. I had to move! I am getting too old for this kind of lifestyle and now I’m not going to unpack anything because I will just have to repack and move again at some point. I don’t know if that is
Writing While Disabled 
Well, when people say writing every day, I think some people take it too literally. I think there's a lot of misunderstanding about writing every day. People use the term dailyness to mean consistency. Write Consistently. Time-wise, write consistently. You build a practice. Because remember what I said earlier, a writer is someone who writes. It's about being in the present. Writing has to be a present practice for you. That's all it means.
Issue 20 Nov 2023
Issue 13 Nov 2023
Issue 6 Nov 2023
Issue 30 Oct 2023
Issue 16 Oct 2023
Issue 9 Oct 2023
Issue 2 Oct 2023
Issue 25 Sep 2023
Issue 18 Sep 2023
Issue 11 Sep 2023
Load More
%d bloggers like this: